The map shows the locations associated with the creation of historical documents whose authenticity has been debated, revealing the geographical context of these documents and the debates surrounding their provenance.
The line-chart shows the most productive centuries for documents as allegedly considered (therefore authentic) and as currently believed by the scholalry community (therefore forged)
The x-axis show the century of creation of the documents
The y-axisis show the number of documents normalised under the total scholalry opinions for each century
The chart shows the evolution of scholalry opinions towards the clafficiation of the documents in the collection.
The x-axis show the date of publication in which the scholalry opinion is stated
The y-axisis show the Document ID in the collection
A set og highlights on the collection
Number of documents for each century according to the earlies dates provided by settled sources
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
SELECT ?label (COUNT(?date) AS ?n)
WHERE {
SETT ?g {?s dct:date ?date .}
?date a time:Interval ;
time:hasBeginning ?start ;
time:hasEnd ?end .
BIND(YEAR(?start) AS ?startYear)
BIND(FLOOR(?startYear / 100) * 100 AS ?centuryStart)
BIND(?centuryStart AS ?label)
}
GROUP BY ?label
ORDER BY ?label
Number of documents for each century according to the information now deemed questioned by the community (usually provided by the documents themselves)
400
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
PREFIX conj: <https://w3id.org/conjectures/>
SELECT ?label (COUNT(?date) AS ?n)
WHERE {
CONJ ?g {?s dct:date ?date .}
?date a time:Interval ;
time:hasBeginning ?start ;
time:hasEnd ?end .
BIND(YEAR(?start) AS ?startYear)
BIND(FLOOR(?startYear / 100) * 100 AS ?centuryStart)
BIND(?centuryStart AS ?label)
FILTER NOT EXISTS {?g2 conj:settles ?g}}
GROUP BY ?label
ORDER BY ?label
Which are the most debated documents of the collection?
SELECT ?result ?label (COUNT(DISTINCT ?g) as ?n)
WHERE {
CONJ ?g {?result ?p ?o}
?doc dct:title ?label.
FILTER (lang(?label) = 'en')
}
GROUP BY ?result ?label
ORDER BY DESC (?n)
LIMIT 10
Which are the scholars which are mostly involved in the critical debate?
SELECT ?result ?label (COUNT(DISTINCT ?ref) as ?n)
WHERE {
?opinion prov:wasDerivedFrom|prov:wasQuotedFrom ?ref.
?ref dct:creator ?result.
?result rdfs:label ?label.
FILTER NOT EXISTS{?ref a fabio:ArchivalDocument}
}
GROUP BY ?result ?label
ORDER BY DESC (?n)
LIMIT 10
Which are the scholars whose works have cited in a scholalry opinion?
SELECT ?result ?label (COUNT(?ref) as ?n)
WHERE {
?g prov:wasDerivedFrom ?ref.
?ref dct:creator ?result.
?result rdfs:label ?label.
FILTER NOT EXISTS{?ref a fabio:ArchivalDocument}
}
GROUP BY ?result ?label
ORDER BY DESC (?n)
LIMIT 10
Who are the scholars which produced the highest number of claims?
SELECT ?result ?label (COUNT(?ref) as ?n)
WHERE {
?g prov:wasQuotedFrom ?ref.
?ref dct:creator ?result.
?result rdfs:label ?label.
FILTER NOT EXISTS{?ref a fabio:ArchivalDocument}
}
GROUP BY ?result ?label
ORDER BY DESC (?n)
LIMIT 10
Which are the most accounted documentary features when scholars assess a document's authenticity?
interpolations
chronology and dating
authentication marks
list of witnesses
original document
addition
metre and style
content
document provenance
SELECT ?label (COUNT(?feature) AS ?n)
WHERE {
?evidence sebi:account ?feature.
?feature rdfs:label ?label
}
GROUP BY ?label
ORDER BY DESC (?n)
Which are the most accounted types of documentary features when scholars assess a document's authenticity?
Intrinsic feature
Provenance
Extrinsic feature
SELECT ?label (COUNT(?evidence) AS ?n)
WHERE {
?evidence sebi:account ?feature.
?feature a ?class.
?class rdfs:label ?label.
FILTER(?class != owl:NamedIndividual)
}
GROUP BY ?label
ORDER BY DESC (?n)
Which are the evaluations mostly performed by scholars when assessing a document's authenticity?
presence
consistency
reliability
veridicality
SELECT ?label (COUNT(?evaluation) AS ?n)
WHERE {
?evidence sebi:evaluate ?evaluation.
?evaluation rdfs:label ?label
}
GROUP BY ?label
ORDER BY DESC (?n)
Which types of evidence are most commonly used by scholars when assessing the authenticity of a document?
interpolations presence
no chronology and dating consistency
no original document presence
addition presence
no authentication marks presence
no authentication marks reliability
no list of witnesses veridicality
no metre and style veridicality
no content reliability
no list of witnesses reliability
SELECT (CONCAT(IF(?score = 0, "no ", ""), ?label1, " ", ?label2) AS ?label)
(COUNT(?result) AS ?n)
WHERE {
?opinion sebi:account ?result;
sebi:evaluate ?result2;
sebi:hasEvaluationScore ?score.
?result rdfs:label ?label1.
?result2 rdfs:label ?label2.
}
GROUP BY ?result ?result2 ?label1 ?label2 ?score
ORDER BY DESC(?n)
LIMIT 10
Which are the most recent works addressing the documents of the collection?
SELECT ?result ?label ?n
WHERE {
?g prov:wasDerivedFrom ?result.
?result dct:date ?date.
?date time:hasBeginning ?n.
?result dct:title ?label
}
GROUP BY ?result ?label ?n
ORDER BY DESC (?n)
LIMIT 10
Which are the earliest works addressing the documents of the collection?
SELECT ?result ?label ?n
WHERE {
?g prov:wasDerivedFrom ?result.
?result dct:date ?date.
?date time:hasBeginning ?n.
?result dct:title ?label
}
GROUP BY ?result ?label ?n
ORDER BY ASC (?n)
LIMIT 10